藝術相對論
視覺藝術與表演藝術的「藝」類觀點
受訪藝術家：席時斌
播出時間：2010/3/26 周五18:00-19:00
廣播頻道：台北FM99.7、新竹FM90.7同步播出。
網路廣播：http://www.e-classical.com.tw/
Sunday, March 21, 2010
愛樂電台《藝術相對論》席時斌訪談_播出時間 3/26(五)18:00-19:00
台新藝術獎 / 愛樂電台
藝術相對論
視覺藝術與表演藝術的「藝」類觀點
受訪藝術家：席時斌
播出時間：2010/3/26 周五18:00-19:00
廣播頻道：台北FM99.7、新竹FM90.7同步播出。
網路廣播：http://www.e-classical.com.tw/
藝術相對論
視覺藝術與表演藝術的「藝」類觀點
受訪藝術家：席時斌
播出時間：2010/3/26 周五18:00-19:00
廣播頻道：台北FM99.7、新竹FM90.7同步播出。
網路廣播：http://www.e-classical.com.tw/
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Saturday, March 06, 2010
Thursday, March 04, 2010
《 美的再濫用 The re-abuse of beauty：Halfway House 》 2010/03/10-2010/03/28
展覽Exhibition：
美的再濫用 The re-abuse of beauty：Halfway House
2010/03/10-2010/03/28
(周三至周日 1:00PM~6:00PM 周末至8:00PM)
開幕茶會：2010/03/13 15:00PM
座談會：2010/03/21 15:00PM
講題：藝術社群的中途之家，概念與城市分析。
Topic: Halfway House for Art Community：Concept and Urbanism Analysis
地點：視盟藝文展覽空間 台北中華路一段91巷1號一樓
参展藝術家：
郭慧禪 Niki Kuo, 郭令權 Lynch Kuo, 陳松志 Sung Chen, 莊惠琳 Chuang Hui-lin
展覽執行與参展藝術家：
席時斌 Hsi Shih-Pin
展覽敘述：
「一天夜裡，我置美於膝上，我苦戀著她，也糟蹋著她。」，韓波
中途之家
最近為了要給出獄的人準備一個家，主管人士在宣佈的佈置原則中說：「我們打算把它美化，因為美很重要。美可以讓人知道自己是受到重視的。」康德則繼續說道，「對於美的判斷，人同此心，普世皆然，也就是說，每個人都是一樣的」。從這個觀點來看，濫用美乃是一種牴觸道德的象徵性作為，因此，實際上也抵觸了人性。韓波在之後的詩中描述自己所付出的代價，承認自己的罪惡之後，馬上接著說：「過去，我是在武裝自己跟天理作對。」
《美的再濫用》一詞竄用丹托“美的濫用”書名，當然我也引用的部分的內文作以渲染我們追求美與美化空間的正當性。丹托將藝術擴充出美的限範，而後美也繼續被真正的濫用。
而我必須再宣言：「我真的是正當的，這裡並不是公有空間，它們不足一提的歷史必被抹除才是，那些試圖談論它們的使者不過出於難改的信仰，我們有更偉大的任務要作，我是藝術家、理論研究者、社會運動者，空間改造者、都市更新者，我是正當的，是的，我將改造並使用它，而我真的不打算談論它們。」
撰稿：席時斌
(此展透過對展出空間的進入，揀選作品以探論城市環境(包含公共與私有)改造中，藝術美學的介入現象與角色)
Concept:
“One night, I placed beauty on my knees- I pursued her, and at the same time I ravished her.”---Arthur Rimbaud
Halfway House
While organising an institution for those who are ready to reintergrate with the society from prison, the authorities announced that the decoration should focus on how to beautify the space, as beauty is important, it makes one feel important. (Kant) people have universal judgement of beauty. in other words,people are all the same. At this point, the abuse of beauty could be seen symbolically as the contradiction of morality,hence contradiction of humanity. Arthur Rimbaud later described the price he paid for his sin, admitted that his crime was 'to arm himself and fight against Justice/Nature/God'.
The 're-abuse of beauty' came from Arthur Danto's book 'The Abuse of Beauty', which of course will be quoted to strengthen our legitimacy of the pursuit of beauty and of beautifying such space. Danto expands art outside the framework of beauty, thus beauty is continuously being abused.
I would also like to make my annoucement: ths space is not owned by the public, the insignificant history should be waived from the context. Those messengers who intend to address it only do so due to the deep rooted belief in their minds. I am an artist, a theorist, a social activist, a space reformer, and an urban regenerator. I am the legitimate user and reformer of this space, but I have no intention to address it.
Writer: Hsi Shih-Pin
美的再濫用 The re-abuse of beauty：Halfway House
2010/03/10-2010/03/28
(周三至周日 1:00PM~6:00PM 周末至8:00PM)
開幕茶會：2010/03/13 15:00PM
座談會：2010/03/21 15:00PM
講題：藝術社群的中途之家，概念與城市分析。
Topic: Halfway House for Art Community：Concept and Urbanism Analysis
地點：視盟藝文展覽空間 台北中華路一段91巷1號一樓
参展藝術家：
郭慧禪 Niki Kuo, 郭令權 Lynch Kuo, 陳松志 Sung Chen, 莊惠琳 Chuang Hui-lin
展覽執行與参展藝術家：
席時斌 Hsi Shih-Pin
展覽敘述：
「一天夜裡，我置美於膝上，我苦戀著她，也糟蹋著她。」，韓波
中途之家
最近為了要給出獄的人準備一個家，主管人士在宣佈的佈置原則中說：「我們打算把它美化，因為美很重要。美可以讓人知道自己是受到重視的。」康德則繼續說道，「對於美的判斷，人同此心，普世皆然，也就是說，每個人都是一樣的」。從這個觀點來看，濫用美乃是一種牴觸道德的象徵性作為，因此，實際上也抵觸了人性。韓波在之後的詩中描述自己所付出的代價，承認自己的罪惡之後，馬上接著說：「過去，我是在武裝自己跟天理作對。」
《美的再濫用》一詞竄用丹托“美的濫用”書名，當然我也引用的部分的內文作以渲染我們追求美與美化空間的正當性。丹托將藝術擴充出美的限範，而後美也繼續被真正的濫用。
而我必須再宣言：「我真的是正當的，這裡並不是公有空間，它們不足一提的歷史必被抹除才是，那些試圖談論它們的使者不過出於難改的信仰，我們有更偉大的任務要作，我是藝術家、理論研究者、社會運動者，空間改造者、都市更新者，我是正當的，是的，我將改造並使用它，而我真的不打算談論它們。」
撰稿：席時斌
(此展透過對展出空間的進入，揀選作品以探論城市環境(包含公共與私有)改造中，藝術美學的介入現象與角色)
Concept:
“One night, I placed beauty on my knees- I pursued her, and at the same time I ravished her.”---Arthur Rimbaud
Halfway House
While organising an institution for those who are ready to reintergrate with the society from prison, the authorities announced that the decoration should focus on how to beautify the space, as beauty is important, it makes one feel important. (Kant) people have universal judgement of beauty. in other words,people are all the same. At this point, the abuse of beauty could be seen symbolically as the contradiction of morality,hence contradiction of humanity. Arthur Rimbaud later described the price he paid for his sin, admitted that his crime was 'to arm himself and fight against Justice/Nature/God'.
The 're-abuse of beauty' came from Arthur Danto's book 'The Abuse of Beauty', which of course will be quoted to strengthen our legitimacy of the pursuit of beauty and of beautifying such space. Danto expands art outside the framework of beauty, thus beauty is continuously being abused.
I would also like to make my annoucement: ths space is not owned by the public, the insignificant history should be waived from the context. Those messengers who intend to address it only do so due to the deep rooted belief in their minds. I am an artist, a theorist, a social activist, a space reformer, and an urban regenerator. I am the legitimate user and reformer of this space, but I have no intention to address it.
Writer: Hsi Shih-Pin
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)